• Link to Instagram
  • Link to LinkedIn
  • Link to Facebook
  • Link to TikTok
Call: (416) 549-4905
  • Free Consultation
  • Home
  • Tax Services
    • CRA Audits
    • Objection
    • Tax Court
    • Penalty and Interest Relief
    • Voluntary Disclosure Program (VDP)
    • Tax Debt
    • Tax Planning
    • Tax Residency
    • Judicial Review
    • Tax Compliance
    • Remission Orders
    • Real Estate Taxation
    • Criminal Prosecution
  • Immigration Services
    • Judicial Review
    • Immigration Appeals
    • Writ of Mandamus
    • Misrepresentation
    • Inadmissibility
    • Deportation Defense
    • Humanitarian & Compassionate (H&C)
  • About
  • Tax Blog
  • FAQ
  • Contact Us
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu
Tax

Tax Residency of Individuals

Tax Residency status for individuals in Canada explained by KR Law Firm - Best Tax Lawyers  in Toronto Canada

“Residency” as a Basis for Taxation 

Residency is the principal connecting factor used for Canadian tax purposes. It underscores the social and economic connections between a person and the taxing authority, which is why Canada uses residency status to imposes tax liability on the worldwide income of “every person resident in Canada.” A non-resident person, on the other hand, is only liable to pay tax on income earned in Canada.

Definition of “Person” Under the Income Tax Act 

The Income Tax Act (“ITA”) defines a “person” to include a corporation and a trust while defining an “individual” as a person other than a corporation. For tax purposes, individuals are treated differently from corporations and trusts in many respects. For instance, while individuals are taxed at progressive rates, corporations are taxed at set fixed rates, with the exact rate dependant on the type of corporation and income they earn. The courts have also set out different tests for determining the residency of individuals, corporations and trusts.

Common Law Test of Residency

In Canada, the leading case on the question of residency is Thomson v. Minister of National Revenue, which sets out the test to determine residence:

To be a resident, there must be “a continuing state of relationship between a person and a place…”

To determine whether there is a continuing state of relationship between an individual and a place, several factors are important and must be examined. Ultimately, this residency test is highly factual, and there is no bright-line test; instead, what is required is a holistic analysis of an individual’s mode of life.

The courts have listed many factors used in their determination of this question, but no one factor is conclusive. Case law following the Thomson case has established several factors. For example, some factors to look at are:

  • Whether the individual has a dwelling place in Canada
  • Whether the individual has a spouse/common-law partner in Canada
  • Whether the individual has dependents in Canada
  • Whether the individual is employed in Canada
  • Whether the individual has a spouse and/or dependents/child in Canada
  • Whether the individual has a Canadian bank account
  • Whether the individual is a Canadian citizen

In addition to these factors, the following represent some of the principles that have developed from common law, which go to determining whether an individual is a resident or not:

  • The intention of the taxpayer, while relevant in determining their residence, is not determinative.
  • A taxpayer can be resident in more than one country at the same time.
  • A taxpayer must be a resident of at least one country at any given time.

“Deemed” Full-Time Resident 

As mentioned, the ITA also contains specific provisions that will deem a person to be a resident of Canada in certain circumstances. One of these provisions is paragraph 250(1)(a) of the ITA, which deems an individual to be a resident of Canada if they have “sojourned in Canada” in the year for a period of 183 days or more.

A sojourner has been defined by the courts to mean an individual who is physically present in Canada, but whose presence in Canada is unlike that of a resident as his or her presence in Canada is on a more transient basis than that of a resident. For example, an individual who is a resident of another country and comes to Canada on a vacation or business trip is a sojourner. If this sojourner stays in Canada for a period totalling 183 days or more during the year, paragraph 250(1)(a) will deem this individual to have been a resident of Canada for that year, and this individual would be liable to pay tax on his or her worldwide income.

International Tax Treaties

Canada has also entered into a tax treaty with certain countries. If a taxpayer is determined to be a resident of two countries, the relevant tax treaty between the two countries will allocate the jurisdiction to tax the taxpayer to one of the two countries.

Got questions? Contact us today and book your free consultation with one of our lawyers.

—

By Kaveh Rezaei – Attorney at KR Law Firm

**Disclaimer 

This article contains information of a general nature only and does not constitute legal advice. All legal matters have their own specific and unique facts and will differ from each other. If you have a specific legal question, it may be appropriate to seek the services of a lawyer. 

Related Articles You’ll Find Useful:

  1. Application of General Anti-Avoidance Rule (GAAR) to Tax Planning
  2. Statutory Interpretation in Tax law
  3. Tax Residency of Corporations
  4. Tax Evasion
November 16, 2020/by KR Law Firm
Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Reddit
  • Whatsapp Whatsapp Share on WhatsApp
https://krlawfirm.ca/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/5.jpg 1428 2000 KR Law Firm https://krlawfirm.ca/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/law-logo-4.svg KR Law Firm2020-11-16 23:49:552025-09-06 02:12:06Tax Residency of Individuals

Read More

  • Canada Tax FAQs: File & Maximize Your Return
  • CRA Audit Letter
  • CRA Collections: Wage Garnishment, Frozen Accounts…
  • CRA Form RC4288
  • Failure to Report Income in Canada
  • Foreign Tax Identifying Number (FTIN)
  • Notice of Objection (T400A)
  • Taxation of Corporations
  • What Happens If You Owe the CRA Money and Cannot Pay?
Link to: Contact Us

Have Questions? We’re Here to Help.

Schedule your consultation today and get expert guidance tailored to your needs.

IMPRINT

KR Law Firm | 5000 Yonge St. Suite #1901, Toronto
Phone: +1 (416) 549-4905 | Fax: +1 (647) 695-2819 | Email: info@krlawfirm.ca
Mon – Fri: 9am – 5pm | Sat – Sun: Closed

DISCLAIMER

The information contained in this website is for general information purposes only. The information is provided by KR Law Firm and while we endeavour to keep the information up to date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information, products, services, or related graphics contained on the website for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

About | Contact | Terms and Conditions

© Copyright 2025 KR Law Firm. All Rights Reserved.

Link to: Corporate Taxation in Canada Link to: Corporate Taxation in Canada Corporate Taxation in CanadaGroup of professionals seated around a table engaged in discussion, with a screen in the background displaying information about Corporate Taxation, representing the topic of corporate taxation in Canada - KR Law Firm - Tax Law Firm in Toronto Link to: Tax Residency of Corporations Link to: Tax Residency of Corporations Illustration of a man in a suit running with a briefcase, with letters labeled 'tax' emanating from the briefcase and dispersing in the air, symbolizing the concept of tax residency of corporations - KR Law Firm - Tax Law Firm in TorontoTax Residency of Corporations
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top